No 6 January 1997 ISSN 1363-9552
Published in London by the Prison Reform Trust
CONTENTS
Private prospects for 1997
Prison populations around the world continued to increase in 1996 and
that trend is likely to continue in 1997. As governments face the conflicting
demands of cutting spending while being seen to be tough on crime,
privatisation will continue to be promoted as a solution. In the coming year
the debate about whether prison works, whether private or publicly run, will
become sharper.
In the short term, the number of prisoners held in private prisons and
immigration detention facilities will increase. While it is hard to predict
exactly how far the global expansion plans of the leading corrections companies
will be accomplished, their immediate future in the US, Australia and the UK is
assured. Only dramatic political shifts accompanied by massive compensation payments
to operators - both of which are out of the question - would change this
situation.
These are the countries which have the most privately run prisons and
where contracts for 20 and 25 years have been awarded. New facilities are under
construction and will open in 1997 and 1998.
At around 20 per cent, Australia still leads the world for the
proportion of prisoners held in private prisons. In the state of Victoria alone, by the end of 1997 over 45 per
cent of prisoners will be in three private prisons, one of which, the
Metropolitan Women's Correctional Centre, opened in 1996.
In England and Wales, 1996 saw the award of a third 25 year finance,
design, build and manage contract for a prison; the renewal of a 1992 contract
to run Wolds (the UK's first privately run prison); and completion of the
privatisation of the prisoner escort service. By the end of 1997 over 3,000
prisoners, some five per cent of the total population, could be in privately
run prisons. Meanwhile, the market testing of existing prisons was abandoned.
The Scottish Prison Service identified a site for its first private prison and
the tendering process will commence in 1997.
A general election early in 1997 could have an impact on prison
privatisation in the UK. If the Tories win, it will be business as usual. If
Labour wins, it has pledged to honour existing prison contracts but not offer
any new ones. The fine print of this pledge has not been seen.
US still two per cent
Despite a doubling of its prisoner population in the last ten years, and
a significant increase in contracts for private prisons awarded at state,
county and municipal level in 1996, the US still has under two per cent of its
prisoners held privately. Private facilities for adults exist in 18 states.
Texas has the most with 38 of the 124 private jails open or expected to open
soon and 23,000 of the 74,000 private
places. At 5,900 Florida has the second highest private prisoner population.
In 1996, the leading US prison operator, Corrections Corporation of
America, increased its bed capacity by some 10,000 and won contracts in five
new states and the District of Columbia. All three of the largest US companies
raised new capital to finance their anticipated new year expansion.
Congress has now mandated the
Federal Bureau of Prisons to embark on privatisation, despite the Bureau's
reservations, and the first two privately run Federal prisons will be in
California and could open in 1997.
It is expected that in the US the private sector will expand further
into provision for juveniles.
In Canada, the Ontario government will open a private boot camp in early
1997 and plans for five 'superjails' will get underway, although the full
extent of private involvement has yet to be announced. New Brunswick's
Miramichi youth facility, financed and designed by Wackenhut will open. In Nova
Scotia, where the planning of a new corrections system has been privatised, a
decision is awaited as to how much will eventually be in privately run.
In New Zealand contracts for a new prison in Auckland could be awarded
in 1997. The South African government has embarked on the private finance of
new prisons and Panama is expected to launch its private prison programme with
the passing of enabling legislation.
In 1996, Brazil’s National Council for Criminal and Penitentiary Policy
voted against privatisation. Financial and political obstacles could undermine
the potential for private prisons elsewhere in Central and South America.
Within the European Union, notwithstanding programmes for state asset
sales, cuts to public services and welfare and the presence of companies such
as Group 4, Securicor, Sodexho (which partly owns CCA) and Wackenhut,
governments are less likely to privatise prisons in the short term. France's
programme of 'prisons hybrides' (state employed prison officers but all other
services contracted out) will continue. The contracting out of immigration
detention centres, which already exists in England and Germany, could be
extended.
Eastern Europe is regarded by prison companies as a huge potential
market with criminal justice systems undergoing reforms. But there is concern
over political stability and the lack of finance in the region.
Religious organisations in the East and West want to expand from just
providing pastoral services to running
entirely faith-based non-profit
prisons.
Other services
1996
saw an increase in the privatised planning of future correctional needs and the concept of public/private
partnerships. There was also growth in electronic monitoring and the provision
of privatised food, health care and prisoner escorting services as well as
other corrections department functions. These trends are likely to
continue in 1997. The companies still regard all aspects of criminal justice systems as their potential
market.
Performance balance sheet
In 1996, contracts became
more sophisticated and performance indicators changed. Commercial secrecy over contracts and operations
was maintained, but it was still
possible to confirm that the general performance pattern of private prisons in
England and Australia continued. On opening, there are numerous problems for
staff and prisoners which tend to be resolved after a year to 18 months. In
England, the validity of official figures about comparative cost savings was
disputed.
In the US, scrutiny of new prisons was not as close as in England or Australia so public knowledge was generally limited to media headlines about escapes, disturbances and corrupt officials, both private and public. The General Accounting Office (GAO) report on US prisons found that no conclusions about cost savings or quality of service could be drawn. This became the focus of a heated debate.
Overall, there is still no consensus that private prisons fully live up to their claimed superiority. Arguments over ethics, legitimacy and accountability will continue, as will the need to monitor developments.
Row over
women’s prison
Allegations of drug use,
violence, inadequate security, low staffing levels and high staff turnover at
Victoria's Metropolitan Women's Correctional Centre have been detailed in a
report by a former prison officer. The prison, which opened last August, is run
by Corrections Corporation of Australia.
The allegations include:
n 11 operational staff as well
as administrative and nursing staff had left because of safety concerns and
poor working conditions.
n Costs had been cut to the
point where security had been compromised, resulting in officers being
assaulted.
n Despite the government's
intention that the prison would be drug free, up to three quarters of drug
tests carried out on prisoners have resulted positive.
n Prisoners are listed as
working when they are not, to make it look as if the prison has 100 per cent
employment.
n Management has abused prison
officers in front of prisoners and junior staff, undermining their authority.
The company has rejected the allegations while the Victoria government
has said that, as the prison is run privately, it would not be appropriate to
comment on day to day operational issues.
The Justice Department has also refused an application under the Freedom
of Information Act for public access to the prison contract. “If disclosed,
this material will be likely to expose the agency and the private operators to
disadvantage,” it said.
Running from
Group 4
Following the escape of two prisoners working outside the perimeter
fence at Group 4-run Mt. Gambier prison in South Australia, local
residents have demanded that the
company should be penalised. It cannot be done. When Group 4 negotiated the
contract they argued that only escapes
from within the prison should carry a
penalty and not escapes by prisoners working outside the perimeter fence.
These escapes have prompted the
government to review security measures for all prisoners sent on outside work
programmes. It has been testing the feasibility of using electronic tagging to
minimise the risk of escape.
Queensland restructures
The state government is restructuring its corrections system. In 1997,
the Queensland Corrective Services Commission will continue to deliver
government policy but a new agency known as Queensland Corrections will be set
up to compete with the private sector in building and running prisons. The
Commission's role will be altered so that it also monitors public and private
sector operations. The restructuring
came about partly as a result of the 1995 tendering exercise for the design,
construction and running of Woodford
prison which resulted in an in-house win for the Commission. A subsequent
examination of that process highlighted perceived conflicts of interest where
the Commission was both purchaser and provider. The State Public Service
Federation believes the restructuring is the first step towards full
privatisation.
For the record
The Justice Department plans to contract out Victoria's criminal and prison records. Negotiations are currently underway with the Australian subsidiary of the Japanese electronics firm Fujitsu for the management of data, including ministerial correspondence and financial information for prisons, courts and tribunals. However, the trade unions and the Labor opposition have expressed their concern about non-government employees having access to such sensitive information.
ACT reports
A new report on the future prison needs of the Australian Capital
Territory calls for the existing remand centre to be closed and a combined
prison and remand facility be built before the year 2000. Whether the new
facility should be publicly or privately run has yet to be decided but the
report favours the former, suggesting that there is no proof that the private
sector could do the job any cheaper than a reformed public sector.
Junee
improves
Junee Correctional Centre, New South Wales' only privately managed prison, opened in April 1993. It is managed by Australasian Correctional Management (Wackenhut). In 1994/95, a report by the government's liaison officer appointed to monitor the prison's performance cited a range of deficiencies in the prison's operation. However, the recently published report for July 1995 to June 1996 stated that there had been significant improvements. Some minor changes were recommended.
DC signs with
CCA
The District of Columbia
has signed a contract with Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) for the
company to buy and operate the 866 place medium security Correctional Treatment
Facility. CCA will buy the facility for
$52m and lease it back to the District for $2.8m per year for 20 years. CCA
regards the contract as "one of the most important opportunities in the
company's history" and expects that it will generate over $22m in annual
management revenues. The 375 existing staff, all members of a trade union, will
be offered jobs by CCA.
The District of Columbia now plans to privatise six of the seven
remaining components of its corrections system. Ultimately 8,000 of its prisoners will be in private jails.
n By 1 April 1997, CCA will hold 1,500 DC prisoners in a
new jail being built in Youngstown, Ohio. CCA formerly had a contract to hold
DC prisoners in a Tennessee jail.
Operators to
pay
The Texas Board of Criminal Justice is to limit its response to riots
at, and escapes from, the 38 privately run jails in the state and charge
companies if assistance is required. The Bobby Ross Group was recently charged
$1,200 for a dog team used in tracking two escapees.
The state of Arizona has also
asked CCA for reimbursement following
an escape last October by six prisoners from the Central Arizona Detention
Center.
CCA, which contracts to keep 200
of Alaska’s prisoners at the facility, may also be ordered to meet a bonding requirement to serve
as financial insurance against future
escapes
Florida’s
needs
The Florida Corrections Commission has estimated that it needs 35,000 new prison beds in the next five years and 72,000 over ten years. It has recommended that new facilities authorised in 1997 should be private.
Monitoring
progress
A Home Office report on the electronic tagging trials taking place in three areas of England concludes that more work and many more experimental curfew orders are needed before the scheme can be expanded nationally. Issues such as the future role of the Probation Service, how electronic tagging is costed and guidance for sentencers all need to be clarified.
Some 236 offenders have been tagged so far, but the report only studied
83 cases. According to the National Association of Probation Officers, the 25 per
cent failure rate of curfew orders is double that of probation orders. But the
government is still keen to expand tagging
to the level the contractors, Geografix and Securicor, need for the
scheme to be profitable. This figure is
thought to be 15,000 offenders at any one time.
Prison visitors
Doncaster prison has attracted much international attention since it
opened in 1994. Visitors have included
ministers and/or prison officials from Victoria, South Australia, Queensland,
Germany, Czech Republic, Poland, Latvia, Bulgaria and Colombia as well as
members of the European Prison Education Association.
CCA in
control
Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) is now the sole owner of UK Detention Services Ltd, the company which runs Blakenhurst prison. Both CCA’s former partners, British construction firms, have sold their shares.
Agency status
warning
A new study of UK government agencies, including the Prison
Service, has found the model deeply flawed and warns of the consequences if the
US copies it. The Performance of Government
Agencies in Britain: Implications for the USA. Available from: Centre for
Public Services, 1 Sidney Street, Sheffield, S1 4RG, England.
Tel:
++ 44 0114 2726683.
At the trough
“While arrests and
convictions are steadily on the rise, profits are to be made - profits from crime.
Get in on the ground floor of this booming industry now.”
“Leading industry analysts will give expert forecasts on future growth
potential for the private prison industry and how to make the most of
investments today ... hear from over 50
prominent industry leaders ... as they share their insights on how to
capitalize on a new era of opportunities...”
This was the juicy invitation to a three day World Research Group
conference in Dallas in December 1996.
More evidence - if any was needed - that the privatisation of prisons and
related services is first and foremost about creating new markets for big
business.
The $1,295 fee ($995 for
government) drew 130 people from brokerage firms, investment banks, securities firms, private corrections firms
and service providers.
There were presentations on
investment opportunities by executives from Wackenhut, Correctional Services
Corp, Avalon Community Services, Cornell Corrections, Youth Services
International, Youth Track Inc, Children's Comprehensive Services and Res-Care
Inc.
Analysis of the industry's stock market performance was provided by
Janney Montgomery Scott, Montgomery Securities, First Dallas Securities,
Stephens Inc, Rodman & Renshaw Inc and Oppenheimer & Co Inc. The evaluation of risk and rewards of
investing in correctional facility funding was offered by Wackenhut, Municipal
Capital Markets Group, Stephens Inc, Merrill Lynch & Co, Standard &
Poor's and MBIA Insurance.
Those present were also given forecasts of the growth potential of
privatisation by representatives from the American Correctional Association,
Florida Correctional Privatisation Commission, and the Texas, Arizona,
Louisiana and Virginia departments of corrections. Giving an Australian
perspective was Tony Wilson, head of
Victoria's New Prisons Project who, along with Tim Wilson of the English
Prison Service and Fred Honsberger of
Nova Scotia's Correctional Services Division, also spoke about public
agency assessments of contracting for facility management.
Discovering
the investment potential of service providers was in the hands of America
Service Group Inc and EMSA Correctional Care on health care; electronic monitoring was covered by
Tracking Systems Corp and Intelligent Surveillance Corp; food services by
ARAMARK and Correctional Foodservice Management; and telecommunications by
Price Waterhouse Inc, Gateway Technologies Inc, Global TeL.Link, BellSouth
Communications, AT&T and GTE.
The international corporate view was provided by Group 4, Securicor,
Wackenhut, Atlantic Corrections Group and Management & Training Corp.
There were also “hands on correctional facility tours” and the chance to
“network” with special guests from firms such as the Bobby Ross Group,
Management & Training Corp, Civigenics, Correctional Systems Inc, Corrections National Corp and Fenton
Securities.
As Roy L. Chun of Standard & Poor’s advised: “A contract must be tightly written so inmates can’t be pulled out easily, leaving a prison without revenue. You want to keep it so that there’s not a lot the state can do if there’s a riot or unhappiness with the management.” Prudential Securities’ James Thayer said: “I think the industry looks very attractive.” Michael Harling of Municipal Capital Markets told the operators to build jails without contracts. “Build ... and they will come,” he said.
The event was so successful it is being repeated later this year.
|
Prison
Privatisation Report International |
|
This bulletin is published ten times a year by the
Prison Reform Trust (PRT).
Subscription Rates: Corporate sector £100 for ten issues; other organisations £50, individuals £25.
Discounts are available for bulk purchases.
Contributions of information on prison privatisation
are welcome. For information about
the Prison Reform Trust’s work and other publications please contact: Prison Reform Trust, 15 Northburgh Street, London
EC1V 0AH, England. Tel: ++44
171 251 5070 Fax: ++44 171 251 5076 Registered Charity No. 1035525. Company Limited by
Guarantee No. 2906362. Registered in England. |