| Public Services International Research Unit |
|
|
Resources 10
|
|
(from PSPRU paper for EPSU conference in Slovenia May 1997) The deregulated electricity market in Nordic countriesThe Nordic countries have already started introducing an internationally open market for electricity. From the beginning of 1996, electricity has been freely traded on a spot market covering both Sweden and Norway. This is being extended to include Finland. In addition, large customers have been able to negotiate contracts for supply of electricity, and this is being extended to domestic consumers as well. The experience in these countries is of great interest for others, as the EU has now decided to impose a gradual introduction of this kind of competition across Europe. The experience of Sweden is of especial interest:
This paper looks at four features of what has been happening:
The introduction of trading has prompted a scramble of takeovers and mergers. This has had three results:
The companies and the trade unions also expect there to be a reduction in employment as the companies seek to realise the profits from these mergers. The large power companies have bought other generators, in order to reduce competition and reduce costs by rationalisation: ".. synergy effects and decreased competition can increase profits by 15%" (FT Business Report 15.11.96). The three big state-owned companies - Statkraft (Norway), Vattenfall (Sweden) and IVO (Finland) have increased their dominance. Both Statkraft and Ivo have bought significant stakes in Swedish generators (Sydkraft andGullspandkraft respectively), while Vattenfall has taken over companies in all three countries.Vattenfall and IVO are increasingly active outside the Nordic region as well. The generators have also been buying regional distributors, in order to guarantee outlets for their power in the new competitive market. The five largest generators in Sweden already control 44% of distribution as well. In the process, distribution is also rationalised and made more profitable, with further cost reductions. Vattenfall, for example, has a declared strategy of buying distribution companies with a view to merging them into larger units. At the same time, the companies see a need to invest more in marketing and services in order to attract customers. Companies from outside the region, in particular EdF and Preussenelektra (Veba) have also sought to buy into generating companies in order to participate in the first open market in Europe. This has resulted in complex patterns of ownership, with states, municipalities and private companies all : the Swedish generator Sydkraft, for example, is currently 27% owned by the German company Preussenelektra (part of the Veba group), 22% owned by the Norwegian state-owned electricity company Statkraft, and 19% owned by the Swedish municipality of Malmoe - a mixed company in every sense. Energy policy: nuclear closuresIn February 1997 the Swedish government made a series of interventionist decisions in energy policy. Most of these decisions have a significant effect on the operations of Vattenfall.
Although Norway is one of the biggest producers of natural gas, owned by the state company Statoil, it consumes none itself At present, Sweden only imports Danish natural gas, and gas is not used much. There are no gas-fired electricity generating plants The nuclear closures make it likely that gas will increase its share of the Swedish energy market.. The companies which dominate the electricity sector also dominate the gas interests in Sweden. One is Sydkraft, whose subsidiary Sydgas distributes much of the gas in Sweden. The sole gas importer is Vattenfall Naturgas, which is now just 50% owned by Vattenfall. The other shares have been sold to Statoil (Norway’s state oil and gas company), DONG (the Danish gas company), Ruhrgas (the privately-owned German gas company) and Neste (of Finland). The company is carrying out a study into alternative sources of gas, and possible developments of gas sales in Sweden. One company still not present in Sweden is the Russian gas company Gazprom. It has been unable to get agreement for a pipeline through Sweden, and is now planning a link from Finland under the Baltic to Germany. Annexe: Who Owns Whom in Sweden (1998)
|